Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Alaska

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative

Anchorage, AK · ~89 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative runs at 966% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative: 11.6 TCR = 966% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative safety composite

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative: 9.6 → 10.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 18.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2024

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 0.9 from 9.6 in 2017 to 10.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Anchorage, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 966% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO WA-Clark County RC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WA-Clark County RC (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alaska Village Electric Cooperative averages 11.6 TCR (966% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2019=18.6 · 2021=16 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=10.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Alaska Village Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Electric power generation, fos employers in Alaska.

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (89 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alaska Village Electric Cooperative
Alaska Village Electric Cooperative (89 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Alaska Village Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.5 10.5 9 0 0
2023 3.3 1.1 1 2 0
2021 16.0 3.2 7 8 0
2019 18.6 9.3 16 0 0
2017 9.6 5.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AK · Anchorage

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WA-Clark County RC 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scrubgrass Reclamation Company LP 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PANTHER CREEK POWER OPERATING 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franz Family Bakeries - Anchorage 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANCHORAGE AK 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sea Star North 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spenard Roadhouse 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR Ng - Britton Truss 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 227 La Quinta 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisburg Pa - 072 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Primrose of Washington 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Charlotte Airport 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Embassy Suites 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Greater Boston Food Bank 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepsi-Cola of Rockford 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.