Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Pennsylvania

Panther Creek Power Operating

Nesquehoning, PA · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panther Creek Power Operating runs at 836% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Panther Creek Power Operating: 10.0 TCR = 836% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panther Creek Power Operating safety composite

Panther Creek Power Operating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Panther Creek Power Operating: 7.1 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Panther Creek Power Operating's TCR rose 4.3 from 7.1 in 2022 to 11.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Nesquehoning, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 836% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #45/46
  • PHOTO Scrubgrass Reclamati…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scrubgrass Reclamation Company LP (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Panther Creek Power Operating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panther Creek Power Operating averages 10.0 TCR (836% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panther Creek Power Operating TCR series: 2022=7.1 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=11.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Panther Creek Power Operating falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 46 Electric power generation, fos employers in Pennsylvania.

Panther Creek Power Operating (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Panther Creek Power Operating
Panther Creek Power Operating (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Panther Creek Power Operating has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.4 5.7 4 0 0
2023 11.5 8.7 4 0 0
2022 7.1 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · Nesquehoning

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Nesquehoning, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scrubgrass Reclamation Company LP 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENERA CAMBALACHE 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction - Sub & Trans 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwich Public Utilities 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.A.C. Mushrooms Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Oysters 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Spawning, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POCSC Pocono Service Center 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR KME 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2967-PA20 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redner's Warehouse Market Nesquehoning 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Sign and Display, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Coho Distributing LLC - Tumwater 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Unn 1 & 2 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rgv Delivers 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bottlers Company International 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - XSA1 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HPX2 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HOK2 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.