General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) · Oregon

Albany

Albany, OR · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Albany runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) workplace, earning a grade C.

Albany: 5.1 TCR = 113% of General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Albany safety composite

Albany scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Albany: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Albany's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111998 · Albany, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #15/19
  • PHOTO Tri-State Turf of NC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tri-State Turf of NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Albany in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Albany averages 5.1 TCR (113% of the General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Albany TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Albany falls in its industry

128 General combination crop farmi establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 19 General combination crop farmi employers in Oregon.

Albany (32 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Albany
Albany (32 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Albany has fewer employees than the General combination crop farming (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 1.7 4 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2022 8.8 8.8 2 0 0
2021 11.4 3.8 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 7.0 3.5 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111998 · OR · Albany

128 General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 163 employers in Albany, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tri-State Turf of NC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roth Farms, Inc 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodness Gardens Inc 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ASSOCIATED FRUIT CO. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obersinner Farms, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaylock Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morena Forests LLC 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0558 - Albany DC 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0558 - Albany OR DC 1,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linn-Benton Community College 1,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Millersburg Operations 896 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln Park Boring Co. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sarbanand Farms- WA 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #46 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Graphic Solutions 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WOM - Subsea 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Hotels Ltd - Marriott Courtyard - Ewing 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Granite City Terminal 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holly Hill 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.