Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Minnesota

Albert Lea Office and Shop

Albert Lea, MN · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Albert Lea Office and Shop runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Albert Lea Office and Shop: 2.6 TCR = 95% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Albert Lea Office and Shop safety composite

Albert Lea Office and Shop scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2017→2021

Albert Lea Office and Shop injury rate improved

Albert Lea Office and Shop's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Albert Lea, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/107
  • PHOTO Zignego Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zignego Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Albert Lea Office and Shop in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Albert Lea Office and Shop averages 2.6 TCR (95% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Albert Lea Office and Shop TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Albert Lea Office and Shop falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 107 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Minnesota.

Albert Lea Office and Shop (65 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Albert Lea Office and Shop
Albert Lea Office and Shop (65 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Albert Lea Office and Shop has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.2 0.0 3 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2017 7.7 3.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MN · Albert Lea

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 93 employers in Albert Lea, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zignego Company 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Paving Company 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siema Construction LLC Lafayette 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley Road Department 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Prairie 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hibbing Public Utilities 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Virginia Public Utilities 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services Inc-MN-Lakeville 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Albert Lea 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lou-Rich Front Street 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1020 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1020 261 FTE
NAT-TCR Custom-Pak Products, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Human Development 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amerhart Ltd. - Pekin 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardings Markets 902 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quality Holdings, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Interiors Furniture Company - High Point 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocore-Burkesville 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Boardman 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.