Water control and quality program administration · New Mexico

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority

Albuquerque, NM · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority: 11.8 TCR = 369% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority safety composite

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2019

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority injury rate improved

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority's TCR fell 4.9 from 15.2 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=10.1 · 2019=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Albuquerque, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 369% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK P13
  • PHOTO Public Works
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority averages 11.8 TCR (369% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=10.1 · 2019=10.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority (23 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority
Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority (23 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority has fewer employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.2 5.1 2 0 0
2017 10.1 5.0 2 0 0
2016 15.2 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · NM · Albuquerque

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro Field Operations Department 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00000010 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0049-00000010 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carlsbad 167 Kelly Rd, Carlsbad, NM 88220 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE NMD Main 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Electric Cooperative, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alamogordo Construction Center 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Weyand Food & Son 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Iowa Missouri 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0815 Spokane 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Progreso LMMM Houston # 27, LLC 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elmira Stamping & Manufacturing Corp. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Fernando Valley Adult Day Health Care 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Naples Operations 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.