Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (except laser surgical) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Alcon Sinking Spring

Sinking Spring, PA · ~944 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alcon Sinking Spring runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (except laser surgical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Alcon Sinking Spring: 3.1 TCR = 94% of Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (except laser surgical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alcon Sinking Spring safety composite

Alcon Sinking Spring scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2019

Alcon Sinking Spring injury rate improved

Alcon Sinking Spring's TCR fell 0.6 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Sinking Spring, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #38/42
  • PHOTO Domico Med-Device
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~944 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Domico Med-Device (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Alcon Sinking Spring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alcon Sinking Spring averages 3.1 TCR (94% of the Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (except laser surgical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alcon Sinking Spring TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Alcon Sinking Spring falls in its industry

741 Ophthalmic instruments and app establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 42 Ophthalmic instruments and app employers in Pennsylvania.

Alcon Sinking Spring (944 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Alcon Sinking Spring
Alcon Sinking Spring (944 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Alcon Sinking Spring has more employees than the Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 1.5 28 0 0
2018 3.5 2.5 30 3 0
2017 3.2 2.5 12 15 0
2016 3.1 2.2 15 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · PA · Sinking Spring

741 Ophthalmic instruments and apparatus (except laser surgical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in Sinking Spring, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Domico Med-Device 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchid Memphis 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIDI Products Neenah 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tegra Medical MS LLC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MDT4 944 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashley Furniture Industries - Leesport 945 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Distribution RSC 943 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dorney Park and Wildwater Kingdom 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Precision Device - West 968 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1717 LOWE S OF S. READING PA 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1717 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manor Care Health Services - Sinking Spring 168 FTE
NAT-TCR 6354-OFFS 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elgin Recycling Electronics Warehouse 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fryman-Kuck General Contractors Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Nikko San Francisco 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CNH Industrial - Racine Offices 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerry Ingredients 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennova Healthcare 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail 944 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.