Steel manufacturing · Indiana

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail

Columbia City, IN · ~944 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steel manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Steel manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail safety composite

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail: 1.1 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.1 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Columbia City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #18/42
  • PHOTO ArcelorMittal Coates…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~944 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Steel manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail falls in its industry

416 Steel manufacturing establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 42 Steel manufacturing employers in Indiana.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail (944 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail
Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail (944 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail has more employees than the Steel manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.8 17 0 0
2023 2.0 1.0 20 0 0
2022 1.1 0.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Columbia City

416 Steel manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 67 employers in Columbia City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Engineered Bar Products 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Works 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCP - Casa Grande 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Therma Tru 947 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franciscan Health Michigan City 938 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Electric Co., Inc. 952 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2272-22720275 953 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Structural & Rail Division 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Columbia City 529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Undersea Sensor Systems Inc 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micropulse, Inc. 392 FTE
NAT-TCR Sledge, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelley's Electrical Service, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Buske Lines Inc. 210 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Upper Occoquan Service Authority 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - PDX7 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMD Des Plaines 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medtronic 944 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerojet Rocketdyne - Camden 944 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.