Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Wisconsin

Alden Estates of Jefferson

Jefferson, WI · ~127 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alden Estates of Jefferson runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Alden Estates of Jefferson: 9.2 TCR = 141% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alden Estates of Jefferson safety composite

Alden Estates of Jefferson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2021

Alden Estates of Jefferson injury rate improved

Alden Estates of Jefferson's TCR fell 2.6 from 12.0 in 2016 to 9.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2018=6.1 · 2021=9.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Jefferson, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.2 · 141% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #271/355
  • PHOTO LindenGrove Communit…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LindenGrove Communities LLC - Mukwonago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Alden Estates of Jefferson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alden Estates of Jefferson averages 9.2 TCR (141% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alden Estates of Jefferson TCR series: 2016=12 · 2018=6.1 · 2021=9.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Alden Estates of Jefferson falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #271 safest of 355 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Wisconsin.

Alden Estates of Jefferson (127 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alden Estates of Jefferson
Alden Estates of Jefferson (127 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Alden Estates of Jefferson has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.4 9.4 6 2 0
2018 6.1 6.1 6 0 0
2016 12.0 12.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WI · Jefferson

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Jefferson, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LindenGrove Communities LLC - Mukwonago 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coronado Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Coronado at Stone Oak 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Health Care-Ramseur 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cranbury Center 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE NPL Great Lakes LLC - Wisconsin 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Foods - New Richmond 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bel Brands USA 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wisconsin Whey Protein- Darlington 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generac Power Systems Inc. 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3499 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Pet Care - Jefferson 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3499 243 FTE
NAT-TCR 39 - 40 Freneau Avnue Operating Company, LLC 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Air, Inc. Anaheim 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ARC - Hamburg Plant 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecovery, LLC 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alden Lakeland 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Eggs Kitchen 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby - 4401 East Dixon Boulevard 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoals Technologies, LLC 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.