Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Generac Power Systems Inc.

Jefferson, WI · ~362 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Generac Power Systems Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Generac Power Systems Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Generac Power Systems Inc. safety composite

Generac Power Systems Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2020→2024

Generac Power Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Generac Power Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 2.1 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335313 · Jefferson, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO L3Harris Maritime Po…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~362 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L3Harris Maritime Power & Energy Solutions Inc. Philadelphia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Generac Power Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Generac Power Systems Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Generac Power Systems Inc. TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Generac Power Systems Inc. falls in its industry

226 Generator control and metering establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Generator control and metering employers in Wisconsin.

Generac Power Systems Inc. (362 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Generac Power Systems Inc.
Generac Power Systems Inc. (362 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Generac Power Systems Inc. has more employees than the Generator control and metering panels, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 5 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 4 0 0
2021 2.9 1.2 21 0 0
2020 2.1 0.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335313 · WI · Jefferson

226 Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Jefferson, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L3Harris Maritime Power & Energy Solutions Inc. Philadelphia 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydra Electric 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3 Technologies Westwood Corp 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siemens Energy Inc, Richland MS 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biron Mill 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Finishing Solutions- Osseo, WI 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE Master Lock Company LLC Corporate Headquarters 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAUSAU MAIN CAMPUS 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3499 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Pet Care - Jefferson 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3499 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alden Estates of Jefferson 127 FTE
NAT-TCR Protech Powder Coatings, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 272 Richmond Ctr 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Exacta Laboratory Systems, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CBSI Springfield 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tribeca Oven 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Coralville 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nichiha USA 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 169 362 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.