Computers manufacturing · Colorado

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary

Colorado Springs, CO · ~90 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Computers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Computers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary safety composite

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2022→2024

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary injury rate improved

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334111 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO ameritron
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ameritron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Computers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary falls in its industry

114 Computers manufacturing establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Computers manufacturing employers in Colorado.

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary (90 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary
Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary (90 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Aleut Information Technology, LLC - Summary has fewer employees than the Computers manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334111 · CO · Colorado Springs

114 Computers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ameritron 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Group Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quanta Manufacturing Fremont Building 6 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Facility 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Talbott's Mountain Gold LLLP 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaPlata Electric Assn. Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7102102 FPL Thunder Wolf Energy Center 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Asphalt Services LLC 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Guam 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR New York City 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LECO Corporation -- Consumables 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoffman Building Technologies, Inc - Raleigh 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 413008-Butler | NJ | NJL-100 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMR Hospitality, LLC 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVW Equipment Company Inc 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATACO Steel Products 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.