Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing · Wisconsin

ATACO Steel Products

Cedarburg, WI · ~90 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ATACO Steel Products runs at 402% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

ATACO Steel Products: 13.3 TCR = 402% of Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ATACO Steel Products safety composite

ATACO Steel Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2024

ATACO Steel Products injury rate improved

ATACO Steel Products's TCR fell 8.9 from 13.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.0 · 2017=10.0 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=21.4 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=27.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Cedarburg, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 402% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #33/33
  • PHOTO Edwards Manufacturin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edwards Manufacturing Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

ATACO Steel Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ATACO Steel Products averages 13.3 TCR (402% of the Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ATACO Steel Products TCR series: 2016=13 · 2017=10 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=21.4 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=27.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where ATACO Steel Products falls in its industry

391 Presses (e.g., bending, punchi establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 33 Presses (e.g., bending, punchi employers in Wisconsin.

ATACO Steel Products (90 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ATACO Steel Products
ATACO Steel Products (90 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

ATACO Steel Products has more employees than the Presses (e.g., bending, punching, sheari median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.0 4 0 0
2023 4.9 0.8 6 0 0
2022 27.8 2.9 37 1 0
2021 16.6 3.1 16 0 0
2020 8.9 2.5 6 1 0
2019 21.4 6.7 16 0 0
2018 13.1 3.9 9 1 0
2017 10.0 1.3 8 0 0
2016 13.0 7.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · WI · Cedarburg

391 Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 29 employers in Cedarburg, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edwards Manufacturing Company 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elemet Manufacturing, Inc 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPS Plant 5 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro-Matics 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairyland Seed 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gabe's Construction 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBC - Verona 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison WI Branch 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFA-KMP - CEDARBURG WI 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kemps Cedarburg Plant 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Tool & Manufacturing Corp 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedarburg Office - 391 110 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP6 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Family of Caring at Montclair 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Orchard Park Senior Living Community 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Concrete - Austin 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roark Landscaping 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 313008-Lewiston | ME | SME-300 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wall, JFKS Facility 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haworth Conover 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.