Treating wood products with creosote or other preservatives · Louisiana

Alexandria

Alexandria, LA · ~124 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alexandria runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Treating wood products with creosote or other preservatives workplace, earning a grade B.

Alexandria: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Treating wood products with creosote or other preservatives BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alexandria safety composite

Alexandria scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alexandria: 0.2 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Alexandria's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.2 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321114 · Alexandria, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Great Southern Wood …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Southern Wood - Kentucky (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Alexandria in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alexandria averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Treating wood products with creosote or other preservatives BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alexandria TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Alexandria falls in its industry

183 Treating wood products with cr establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Treating wood products with cr employers in Louisiana.

Alexandria (124 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alexandria
Alexandria (124 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Alexandria has more employees than the Treating wood products with creosote or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.1 4 0 1
2023 7.9 0.0 6 3 0
2022 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2021 2.5 1.9 4 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 8 0 0
2018 0.1 0.1 13 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2016 0.2 0.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321114 · LA · Alexandria

183 Treating wood products with creosote or other preservatives employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 142 employers in Alexandria, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Southern Wood - Kentucky 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bestway of New England, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina Pole Leland, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MMR Constructors, Inc. - Belle Chasse Operations 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway LLC - Shell Refinery - Norco 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaSalle Lumber Company, LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Distributing of Shreveport, Inc. 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHRISTUS St. Frances Cabrini Hospital 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rapides Regional Medical Center 1,550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martco, LLC 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linetec Services LLC - South Central Distribution 888 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Indianapolis 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Boone Brothers Roofing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Central Recycling 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OFFICE 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE RidgeWood Health Campus 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Escanaba 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Radcliff, LLC--North Hardin 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Prestonsburg Riverview, LLC 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.