Poles, wood, treating · Minnesota

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury

Woodbury, MN · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Poles, wood, treating workplace, earning a grade B.

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Poles, wood, treating BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury safety composite

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2020→2022

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury injury rate improved

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury's TCR fell 5.9 from 5.9 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321114 · Woodbury, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Carolina Pole Leland…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carolina Pole Leland, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Poles, wood, treating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury TCR series: 2020=5.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury falls in its industry

183 Poles, wood, treating establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Poles, wood, treating employers in Minnesota.

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury (30 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury
Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury (30 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Woodbury has fewer employees than the Poles, wood, treating median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.9 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321114 · MN · Woodbury

183 Poles, wood, treating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carolina Pole Leland, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montevallo 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexandria 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Southern Wood - Kentucky 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Services Group 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
NAT-TCR Harlingen Gin Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marleylilly 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0528 Tyson - Green Forest Further Processing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ABB Inc EL Services North Region 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG553 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE FLO-ODFL 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Change Parts, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Valley Manufacturing of Illinois, Inc 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.