Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying · Florida

Allcomm Networks, Inc.

Hobe Sound, FL · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allcomm Networks, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying workplace, earning a grade A.

Allcomm Networks, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allcomm Networks, Inc. safety composite

Allcomm Networks, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Allcomm Networks, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Allcomm Networks, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Hobe Sound, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/98
  • PHOTO Future Infrastructur…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Future Infrastructure - Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Allcomm Networks, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allcomm Networks, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allcomm Networks, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Allcomm Networks, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Underground cable (e.g., cable establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 98 Underground cable (e.g., cable employers in Florida.

Allcomm Networks, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allcomm Networks, Inc.
Allcomm Networks, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Allcomm Networks, Inc. has fewer employees than the Underground cable (e.g., cable televisio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Hobe Sound

1,605 Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 23 employers in Hobe Sound, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Future Infrastructure - Houston 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro Energy Services Group LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Braidwood Station 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #70 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Bees Florida 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encino Harvesting, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLANT MARKETING LLC FLORIDA 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ft Myers Service Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROOD LANDSCAPE LLC 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0571 132 FTE
NAT-TCR WC Maize 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction Resource Group 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CHS Corporate 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Villa Haven Health and Rehabilitation 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Naws China Lake, Ca Vx-9 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newstream Enterprises LLC - Glenstone 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Mills Elementary School 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.