Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Michigan

Allegan Tubular Products

Allegan, MI · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allegan Tubular Products runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Allegan Tubular Products: 5.8 TCR = 175% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allegan Tubular Products safety composite

Allegan Tubular Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2022

Allegan Tubular Products injury rate improved

Allegan Tubular Products's TCR fell 4.0 from 6.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Allegan, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 175% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO The Troxel Company
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Troxel Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Allegan Tubular Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allegan Tubular Products averages 5.8 TCR (175% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allegan Tubular Products TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Allegan Tubular Products falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Michigan.

Allegan Tubular Products (63 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allegan Tubular Products
Allegan Tubular Products (63 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Allegan Tubular Products has fewer employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 8.6 2.1 4 0 0
2020 7.1 2.4 3 0 0
2019 12.7 7.3 7 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2016 6.2 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MI · Allegan

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 30 employers in Allegan, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Troxel Company 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LJT 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheatland Tube 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHOENIX TUBE 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DeGrandchamps Blueberry Farm 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Macomb 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NHI Commercial 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gerber Construction Co. Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perrigo : Michigan-Allegan (PMI) 3,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegan County 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALLI - Allegan 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL64 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Brooklyn Center Medical 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet of South Pasadena 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota State University, Mankato 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JAN-FL-MCO 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresh Kills Substation 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE CareGivers America LLC Williamsport 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Engine Center Plant 2 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMS Girard 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.