Academies, college or university · Minnesota

Minnesota State University, Mankato

Mankato, MN · ~2,729 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota State University, Mankato runs at 413% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Academies, college or university workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnesota State University, Mankato: 5.8 TCR = 413% of Academies, college or university BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota State University, Mankato safety composite

Minnesota State University, Mankato scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minnesota State University, Mankato held a steady TCR band

Minnesota State University, Mankato's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 20.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=20.4 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 413% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #43/47
  • PHOTO Lyon College
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~2,729 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lyon College (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota State University, Mankato in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota State University, Mankato averages 5.8 TCR (413% of the Academies, college or university BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota State University, Mankato TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=20.4 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 1.4

Where Minnesota State University, Mankato falls in its industry

347 Academies, college or universi establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 47 Academies, college or universi employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota State University, Mankato (2,729 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota State University, Mankato
Minnesota State University, Mankato (2,729 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Minnesota State University, Mankato has more employees than the Academies, college or university median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.5 12 0 0
2019 20.4 15.7 22 0 0
2018 1.2 0.8 21 1 0
2017 0.9 0.7 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · MN · Mankato

347 Academies, college or university employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lyon College 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR William Woods University 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR University Health Service UIC Peoria 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boston Scientific CRM 2,778 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayport Main - CORP 2,823 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mercy Hospital 2,851 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blattner Energy Inc 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI-Premier Drive 1,149 FTE
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet of South Pasadena 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegan Tubular Products 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at P&G Albany Janitorial 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JAN-FL-MCO 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE DC Arena, LP 2,729 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Joseph's Hospital - EHC 2,729 FTE
NAT-SIZE Driscoll Health Systems 2,730 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedCentral Hospital 2,732 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.