Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · California

Alliance Contracting

Hayward, CA · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alliance Contracting runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Alliance Contracting: 10.7 TCR = 369% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alliance Contracting safety composite

Alliance Contracting scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Alliance Contracting held a steady TCR band

Alliance Contracting's TCR held near 0.3 from 10.8 in 2017 to 10.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.8 · 2018=10.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 369% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #68/78
  • PHOTO Astoria Wire & Metal…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Astoria Wire & Metal Products (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Alliance Contracting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alliance Contracting averages 10.7 TCR (369% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alliance Contracting TCR series: 2017=10.8 · 2018=10.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Alliance Contracting falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 78 Industrial building (except wa employers in California.

Alliance Contracting (35 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alliance Contracting
Alliance Contracting (35 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Alliance Contracting has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.6 7.0 3 0 0
2017 10.8 7.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · Hayward

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Astoria Wire & Metal Products 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Custom Meats 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA105 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coronado Stone Products-Phoenix 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Kelso (Wakel) 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Francis Center at the Knolls/Mt. Alverno Center 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Archetype Signmakers, Inc. 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City Ok - Cb Truck Parking 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gary's U-Pull It 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE UG2 - 300 - EOP 100 Summer Street 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/V Arica 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE UG2 -537 - Synergy 10 Post Office Square 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.