Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing · Illinois

Allied Metal Company

Chicago, IL · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allied Metal Company runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Allied Metal Company: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allied Metal Company safety composite

Allied Metal Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Allied Metal Company injury rate improved

Allied Metal Company's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=12.8 · 2018=15.1 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Aluminum Recovery Te…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Allied Metal Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allied Metal Company averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allied Metal Company TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=12.8 · 2018=15.1 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Allied Metal Company falls in its industry

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel employers in Illinois.

Allied Metal Company (63 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Metal Company
Allied Metal Company (63 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Allied Metal Company has fewer employees than the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of al median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 10.9 7.3 6 3 0
2022 8.5 4.9 5 2 0
2021 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2020 3.6 2.4 2 1 0
2019 10.4 7.5 7 0 0
2018 15.1 12.6 12 0 0
2017 12.8 9.3 10 1 0
2016 3.4 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · IL · Chicago

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Source, LLC (GHR02) 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Metals 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRT Aluminum 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-STC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hinsdale Nurseries, Inc. Plano 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE 40L - IL Relay & Ops 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water/Public Works, Public Utiities 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Pro~Cise Inc 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Shop 'n Save 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mathews Brothers Company 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Magic Springs Theme and Water Park 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Dairy Farmers Transit 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE XWO 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE XPI 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Santa Rosa (5103) 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.