Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Indiana

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart

Merrillville, IN · ~113 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart safety composite

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart: 0.0 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2023

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart's TCR rose 5.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 5.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Merrillville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO Plymouth Tube Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plymouth Tube Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Indiana.

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart (113 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart
Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart (113 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.6 3.9 9 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · IN · Merrillville

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 97 employers in Merrillville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Tube Company 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Branch 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMT Masury 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV Quality Tubing 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDH Contracting, Inc 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKinley Packaging 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilchrist & Soames Plainfield, IN 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Packaging International/Polycon Industries, Inc. 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR 275-NiSource-Merrillville IN-SLC 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albanese Confectionery Group 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1618 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regional Mental Health Center 371 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Dairy Transport-Hyrum 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyway Concessions Company LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 6 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Connor Distributing- White River Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Four Rivers Sanitation Authority 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Premier Laundry 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amara Hospice, LLC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE ALK Port Washington 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.