Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Indiana

Plymouth Tube Company

Winamac, IN · ~109 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plymouth Tube Company runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Plymouth Tube Company: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plymouth Tube Company safety composite

Plymouth Tube Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Plymouth Tube Company: 2.2 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2023

Plymouth Tube Company's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.2 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Winamac, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #7/16
  • PHOTO Allied Tube and Cond…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Plymouth Tube Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plymouth Tube Company averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plymouth Tube Company TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Plymouth Tube Company falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 16 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Indiana.

Plymouth Tube Company (109 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plymouth Tube Company
Plymouth Tube Company (109 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Plymouth Tube Company has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 1.5 3 1 0
2022 3.7 3.7 5 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2018 3.1 0.8 4 0 0
2017 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2016 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · IN · Winamac

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 11 employers in Winamac, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allied Tube and Conduit - Hobart 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMT Masury 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV Quality Tubing 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR North American Container Plant 477 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Muncie Svc Ctr 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE 605-NiSource-Fort Wayne IN-Operating HQ 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Starcon @ BP Whiting 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pulaski Memorial Hospital 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galbreath LLC 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pulaski Health Care Center 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Gold Farms 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Morris Plains 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Dirt Cheap 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Nassal Company 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Metal Products 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cresthaven Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Magnolia Manor 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster Container 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maplewood at Brewster 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyoming #173 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.