Iron work, structural, contractors · Michigan

Alloy Construction Service, Inc.

Midland, MI · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Iron work, structural, contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Alloy Construction Service, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Iron work, structural, contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. safety composite

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alloy Construction Service, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Alloy Construction Service, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Midland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO ATLAS STEEL ERECTORS
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATLAS STEEL ERECTORS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alloy Construction Service, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Iron work, structural, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Alloy Construction Service, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Iron work, structural, contrac establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Iron work, structural, contrac employers in Michigan.

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. (56 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Alloy Construction Service, Inc.
Alloy Construction Service, Inc. (56 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Alloy Construction Service, Inc. has fewer employees than the Iron work, structural, contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · MI · Midland

705 Iron work, structural, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATLAS STEEL ERECTORS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR REI Steel, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starko Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Metal Decking of South Florida 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE John B Schaendorf Dairy 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamtramck Energy Services 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Lindberg & Sons Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipparrone Contracting Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR USW-Menard, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Expeditors International of WA, Inc. - BNA 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Boonesborough State Park 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WNA Bremen 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fulfill 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries Inc-Canfields 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBJ Aquatics 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE CQ Insulation Orlando 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.