Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Allston Landing Facility

Allston, MA · ~289 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allston Landing Facility runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Allston Landing Facility: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allston Landing Facility safety composite

Allston Landing Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Allston Landing Facility held a steady TCR band

Allston Landing Facility's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.3 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Allston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #11/27
  • PHOTO Kansas City ODD
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kansas City ODD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Allston Landing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allston Landing Facility averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allston Landing Facility TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Allston Landing Facility falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 27 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Massachusetts.

Allston Landing Facility (289 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Allston Landing Facility
Allston Landing Facility (289 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Allston Landing Facility has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.2 0.8 2 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.3 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.6 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · MA · Allston

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 13 employers in Allston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kansas City ODD 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McNeil Las Piedras 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shire: Westlake Village 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE PROFESSIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS of CT, Inc 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaston Electrical Co. Inc. office 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kidde-Fenwal, Inc 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health Boston DC 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spaulding Nursing & Therapy Center 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hamilton Company Inc 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100089 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR G. Greene Construction Co., Inc. 141 FTE
NAT-TCR NexGen Power Systems 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Marchon 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WI Market 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ACBL - Convent 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Gap Instrumentation 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Village at Germantown 289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.