Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · Maryland

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc.

Havre De Grace, MD · ~289 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. safety composite

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2019→2022

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. injury rate improved

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.9 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.9 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Havre De Grace, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Adhesive Packaging S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adhesive Packaging Specialties (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in Maryland.

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. (289 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cytec Engineered Materials Inc.
Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. (289 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 5 0 0
2020 0.9 0.6 3 0 0
2019 2.9 1.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · MD · Havre De Grace

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 18 employers in Havre De Grace, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adhesive Packaging Specialties 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Gyspum Fort Dodge 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tremco Incorporated - Mameco Plant 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dritac Flooring 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Mechanical Services 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fair Hill 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCVG Elkton 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR B47 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Syensqo (Formerly Solvay) 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Citizens Care & Rehabilitation Center 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastipak- Havre de Grace 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Nestor- Largo Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoy Global 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Caravan Operations - Villa Serena Healthcare Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Industrial Services LLC, Divsion 38 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gaston Electrical Co. Inc. office 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Gap Instrumentation 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allston Landing Facility 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division 289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.