Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building · California

Alpha Structural Inc

Sunland, CA · ~135 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpha Structural Inc runs at 325% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building workplace, earning a grade F.

Alpha Structural Inc: 12.3 TCR = 325% of Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpha Structural Inc safety composite

Alpha Structural Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alpha Structural Inc: 5.7 → 10.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 30.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2023

Alpha Structural Inc's TCR rose 4.8 from 5.7 in 2018 to 10.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Sunland, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 325% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #67/78
  • PHOTO PHRG NSH
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PHRG NSH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Alpha Structural Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpha Structural Inc averages 12.3 TCR (325% of the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpha Structural Inc TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2020=30.5 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=10.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Alpha Structural Inc falls in its industry

698 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 78 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Alpha Structural Inc (135 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpha Structural Inc
Alpha Structural Inc (135 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Alpha Structural Inc has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.5 8.1 13 0 0
2022 9.8 8.4 10 4 0
2021 5.4 4.6 5 2 0
2020 30.5 23.1 10 23 0
2018 5.7 5.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · Sunland

698 Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 9 employers in Sunland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PHRG NSH 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radiant Change Construction, LLC. 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR O'Gorman Brothers, LLC BFU 248 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 33-ARISTIDES CHAVIER 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vino Vid Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers LP | Bakersfield Packinghouse 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pak Avocado 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP PO BOX 111 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR ENERGY CONTROL CENTR 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Energy Control Center 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR 703-00049 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City 002 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR D6 Riverton Yard 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Belair Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02488 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lyondell Basell LPO 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwalk Transit District 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wurth Adams Greenwood 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Welcome Nursing Home 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.