Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction · Texas

Lyondell Basell LPO

La Porte, TX · ~135 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lyondell Basell LPO runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Lyondell Basell LPO: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lyondell Basell LPO safety composite

Lyondell Basell LPO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lyondell Basell LPO held a steady TCR band

Lyondell Basell LPO's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · La Porte, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/114
  • PHOTO United Construction …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Construction Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lyondell Basell LPO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lyondell Basell LPO averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lyondell Basell LPO TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Lyondell Basell LPO falls in its industry

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 114 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer employers in Texas.

Lyondell Basell LPO (135 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lyondell Basell LPO
Lyondell Basell LPO (135 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Lyondell Basell LPO has more employees than the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Constr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · TX · La Porte

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Construction Co Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pipe Fabrication Baton Rouge LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cianbro Corporate 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phillips 66 Westlake LA 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6606 66TH ST LUBBOCK TX 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Texas Builders, LLC 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - San Antonio 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Pipe Fabrication Baton Rouge LA 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Services : ADMIN-Davidson, NC-USA 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Bloomberg 731 Lex Pantry 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oilfield Instrumentation 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norwalk Transit District 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpha Structural Inc 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE NU Levine Mkt Place 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wurth Adams Greenwood 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.