Forklift repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Alta Equipment Company Romulus

Romulus, MI · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alta Equipment Company Romulus runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Forklift repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Alta Equipment Company Romulus: 3.4 TCR = 163% of Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alta Equipment Company Romulus safety composite

Alta Equipment Company Romulus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2021

Alta Equipment Company Romulus injury rate improved

Alta Equipment Company Romulus's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Romulus, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/114
  • PHOTO MULLEN INDUSTRAL HAN…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MULLEN INDUSTRAL HANDLING CORP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Alta Equipment Company Romulus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alta Equipment Company Romulus averages 3.4 TCR (163% of the Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alta Equipment Company Romulus TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Alta Equipment Company Romulus falls in its industry

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenanc establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 114 Forklift repair and maintenanc employers in Michigan.

Alta Equipment Company Romulus (38 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Alta Equipment Company Romulus
Alta Equipment Company Romulus (38 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Alta Equipment Company Romulus has fewer employees than the Forklift repair and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.2 10.2 3 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Romulus

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 199 employers in Romulus, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MULLEN INDUSTRAL HANDLING CORP 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blanchard Machinery Company - Columbia Machine 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nortrax Chippewa Falls 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peraton - USPS Central Repair Facility 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DTW1 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW1 3,502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Romulus Powertrain 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Romulus 1,037 FTE
NAT-TCR Lahey Health Primary Care Arlington 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgestone APM FPD Plant #3 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepsi Cola of Norfolk Nebraska 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SC & ASF - Voorhees 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Bureau 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volvo Logistics Lewis Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Candy Company 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darling Ingredients Inc. Sioux City 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.