Materials handling equipment repair and maintenance services · New York

Mullen Industral Handling Corp

E Syracuse, NY · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mullen Industral Handling Corp runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Materials handling equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Mullen Industral Handling Corp: 3.4 TCR = 163% of Materials handling equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mullen Industral Handling Corp safety composite

Mullen Industral Handling Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mullen Industral Handling Corp: 2.1 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2024

Mullen Industral Handling Corp's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.1 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · E Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 163% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #34/67
  • PHOTO Alta Equipment Compa…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alta Equipment Company Romulus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mullen Industral Handling Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mullen Industral Handling Corp averages 3.4 TCR (163% of the Materials handling equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mullen Industral Handling Corp TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=6.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Mullen Industral Handling Corp falls in its industry

2,560 Materials handling equipment r establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 67 Materials handling equipment r employers in New York.

Mullen Industral Handling Corp (42 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mullen Industral Handling Corp
Mullen Industral Handling Corp (42 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Mullen Industral Handling Corp has fewer employees than the Materials handling equipment repair and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2019 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NY · E Syracuse

2,560 Materials handling equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 6 employers in E Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alta Equipment Company Romulus 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blanchard Machinery Company - Columbia Machine 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nortrax Chippewa Falls 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peraton - USPS Central Repair Facility 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE W D Henry & Sons Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreher Sunrise Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Cooperative - Ithaca 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Management Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR 55-SYRACUSE TERMINAL 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYR - 821 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR MULLEN INDUSTRIAL HANDLING CORP 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4535-0251 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Harbor Springs 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Beatyville, LLC--Lee County 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carilion Clinic Franklin Memorial Hospital Co. 05 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Veterans Care Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richardson Aviation 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Oklahoma City 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaBarge (Dehy) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christensen's Plant Center, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.