Commercial building construction general contractors · Minnesota

Alvin E. Benike, Inc.

Rochester, MN · ~201 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Alvin E. Benike, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 107% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. safety composite

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2021

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. injury rate improved

Alvin E. Benike, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 5.6 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 107% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #65/130
  • PHOTO Jendoco Construction…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jendoco Construction Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alvin E. Benike, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (107% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Alvin E. Benike, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 130 Commercial building constructi employers in Minnesota.

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. (201 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Alvin E. Benike, Inc.
Alvin E. Benike, Inc. (201 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Alvin E. Benike, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.9 1.0 4 0 0
2020 2.0 0.5 4 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 5 0 0
2018 3.6 2.1 7 0 0
2017 5.6 0.7 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Rochester

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jendoco Construction Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CG Schmidt Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JD Consulting LLC DBA JD Traditional Industries 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIC Services LLC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SICK Campus 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Austin - Main Store 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lunds - Mitchell Road Manufacturing 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4223-M2500 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Fromm Reading 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 42431h - Maumee Oh Dc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 416654-Pit-Pleasant Hills Br 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RM Riviera Beach 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Myers and Sons Construction Company 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Hills Health Care Center 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44371b - Orlando Zone 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne Terminal - DOT 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.