Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Texas

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc.

Rowlett, TX · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. safety composite

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2023

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. injury rate improved

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc.'s TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Rowlett, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/194
  • PHOTO Global Earthwork and…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Global Earthwork and Underground (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 194 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Texas.

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. (37 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate A&M Construction and Utilities Inc.
A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. (37 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Rowlett

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 36 employers in Rowlett, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Global Earthwork and Underground 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Contracting 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPS Civil, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keokuk Contractors LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Lake Pointe 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3225 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3225 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR D.R. Horton, Inc. - DFW East 236 FTE
NAT-TCR Carl A. Nix Welding Service Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PWRWG-Cafe * 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Stnly Bwy Edr* 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0654 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Schein - MDBAL 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (9) 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.