Bridge construction · Illinois

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison

Freeport, IL · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison: 2.9 TCR = 102% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison safety composite

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2023

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison injury rate improved

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison's TCR fell 4.2 from 6.8 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Freeport, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 102% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #75/266
  • PHOTO Fred DeRoma & Son, Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fred DeRoma & Son, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison averages 2.9 TCR (102% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 266 Bridge construction employers in Illinois.

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison (37 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison
Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison (37 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Civil Constructors Inc Freeport Structures Divison has fewer employees than the Bridge construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2016 6.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · IL · Freeport

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 74 employers in Freeport, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fred DeRoma & Son, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JJID, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSVT Southern Earthwork 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mick - Murf Construction, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR FHN - Memorial Hospital 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR FHN 1,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helm Mechanical 842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell 630 FTE
NAT-TCR Brick 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas A&M Univ CC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Parts Authority Area 51 - NY Returns 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston North, Tx #00254 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE A&M Construction and Utilities Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Schein - MDBAL 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noonday Austin Office 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (9) 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.