Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Massachusetts

AM Lithography Corporation

Chicopee, MA · ~125 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AM Lithography Corporation runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

AM Lithography Corporation: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AM Lithography Corporation safety composite

AM Lithography Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AM Lithography Corporation: 0.8 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

AM Lithography Corporation's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Chicopee, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/40
  • PHOTO OH201-2 West Chester…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OH201-2 West Chester - Hummingbird East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

AM Lithography Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AM Lithography Corporation averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AM Lithography Corporation TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=4 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where AM Lithography Corporation falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 40 Offset printing (except books, employers in Massachusetts.

AM Lithography Corporation (125 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate AM Lithography Corporation
AM Lithography Corporation (125 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

AM Lithography Corporation has more employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2022 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2021 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 4 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 5 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MA · Chicopee

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 104 employers in Chicopee, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OH201-2 West Chester - Hummingbird East 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herff Jones 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingery Printing Company Henry Division 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winpak Control Group Inc - 500 Walnut Street 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Southboro Electric 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAYCON CONSTRUCTION LLC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Rivers Technologies 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atrium Innovations/ Pure Encapsulations 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR MA-04 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Consumer Product Distributors LLC dba J Polep Distribution Services 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Polep Distribution Services 686 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5278 526 FTE
NAT-TCR Utility Contractors of America, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Concrete Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Challenger - Nature's Way 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sice Miami Office 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bryant Univ Salmanson Dining 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDM Plant 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jaguar Energy Services, LLC 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Michigan City Area Schools Fac 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.