Musical instruments (except toy) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company

Norwell, MA · ~125 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Musical instruments (except toy) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company: 11.3 TCR = 342% of Musical instruments (except toy) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company safety composite

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company: 7.7 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company's TCR rose 2.5 from 7.7 in 2021 to 10.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339992 · Norwell, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 342% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Vic Firth Company
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vic Firth Company (1.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company averages 11.3 TCR (342% of the Musical instruments (except toy) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company TCR series: 2021=7.7 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company falls in its industry

41 Musical instruments (except to establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Musical instruments (except to employers in Massachusetts.

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company (125 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company
Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company (125 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company has more employees than the Musical instruments (except toy) manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 7.6 11 1 0
2023 15.1 7.2 11 8 0
2022 12.2 8.9 10 5 0
2021 7.7 6.7 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339992 · MA · Norwell

41 Musical instruments (except toy) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 60 employers in Norwell, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vic Firth Company 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yamaha Guitar Group, Inc 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paladar 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ernie Ball Inc. 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Southboro Electric 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAYCON CONSTRUCTION LLC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE AM Lithography Corporation 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Rivers Technologies 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. 6,952 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Shore YMCA 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Corporate Office 894 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Shore Medical Center - 143 Longwater 503 FTE
NAT-TCR Amber Court of Elizabeth 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. Plant 76 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount St. Rita Health Centre 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DJE5 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building Service Inc 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trio Manufacturing 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 701 Wall Street 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.