Nuclear Electric Power Generation · Missouri

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management

Steedman, MO · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade C.

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management safety composite

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management held a steady TCR band

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Steedman, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO R.E. Ginna Nuclear P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management TCR series: 2020=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Nuclear Electric Power Generat employers in Missouri.

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management
AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management has fewer employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MO · Steedman

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 10 employers in Steedman, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO White Oak 006-0138-WG, WH, WT 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8LC - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 80G - Nuclear - Maintenance 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Maintenance 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Operations 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR 80B - Nuclear - Operations 123 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrenceburg 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecker Textiles, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Electric Corp 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OYO Times Square 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cape Fear Operations Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamlet 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.