Electric power generation, nuclear · Illinois

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant

Ontario, IL · ~401 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant: 0.0 TCR = 2% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant safety composite

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant held a steady TCR band

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Ontario, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.0 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO Exelon Nuclear Headq…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~401 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant averages 0.0 TCR (2% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Electric power generation, nuc employers in Illinois.

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (401 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (401 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · IL · Ontario

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Nuclear Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Urban Farmer LLC 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company Inc 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3891 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1401 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ntact Constructors, Ltd. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Service Center 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramus 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMP - Augusta General Office 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chestnut Hill 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Welded Product, LLC 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Deerfield Facility 401 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.