Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution · Missouri

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District

St. Charles, MO · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District: 3.2 TCR = 263% of Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District safety composite

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District: 0.0 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2018

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District's TCR rose 9.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · St. Charles, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 263% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #50/127
  • PHOTO Heber Springs
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heber Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District averages 3.2 TCR (263% of the Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.5 · BLS 1.2

Where AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, C establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 127 Electric Power Transmission, C employers in Missouri.

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District (28 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District
AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District (28 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AMEREN MISSOURI - St. Charles District has fewer employees than the Electric Power Transmission, Control, an median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.5 9.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · St. Charles

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 83 employers in St. Charles, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heber Springs 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WARRENSBURG SERVICE CENTER-NY21 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Facilities 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Macon Operating 960 Key Street 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hills 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOPV-SEL-PRAIRIE VIEW - LAYING HEN' 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE State Line Combined Cycle 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino Resort Spa 1,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Hospital - St. Charles 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino Resort Spa St. Charles 1,149 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Missouri 770 FTE
NAT-TCR R&D 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Spring Syracuse Division 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Club Health & Rehabilitation Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Reclamation Technologies Inc DBA A-Gas Americas 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Methodist Morton Family Medicine 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05973 - WM of AR TN AL KY Accounting Office 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE WVUH Student Health and Urgent Care 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highlands Regional Medical Center - FL 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.