Racks, household-type, made from purchased wire · Tennessee

American Appliance Products Madison

Madison, TN · ~49 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Appliance Products Madison runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Racks, household-type, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade A.

American Appliance Products Madison: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Racks, household-type, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Appliance Products Madison safety composite

American Appliance Products Madison scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2019

American Appliance Products Madison injury rate improved

American Appliance Products Madison's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Madison, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/16
  • PHOTO Jackson Rubbermaid
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Rubbermaid (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

American Appliance Products Madison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Appliance Products Madison averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Racks, household-type, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Appliance Products Madison TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where American Appliance Products Madison falls in its industry

270 Racks, household-type, made fr establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 16 Racks, household-type, made fr employers in Tennessee.

American Appliance Products Madison (49 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Appliance Products Madison
American Appliance Products Madison (49 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

American Appliance Products Madison has fewer employees than the Racks, household-type, made from purchas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · TN · Madison

270 Racks, household-type, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 69 employers in Madison, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Rubbermaid 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laclede Chain Vicksburg 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indusco Wire Rope & Fittings (Baltimore, MD) 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE THOMAS BUILDERS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carter Group, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sain Construction Co. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson Transit Organization 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 695 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 695 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-Star Skyline Madison Behavioral Campus 269 FTE
NAT-TCR Salem Christian Homes, Inc.-Bonnie Brea Home 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Christian Homes, Inc.-Casa Puente 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Duperon Headquarters 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph Lane Middle School 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Obx-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Outer Banks 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentucky APG 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faf Ewr 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinic - Rice Street 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.