Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing · Minnesota

American Artstone Company

New Ulm, MN · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Artstone Company runs at 503% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

American Artstone Company: 16.6 TCR = 503% of Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Artstone Company safety composite

American Artstone Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.5

2016→2024

American Artstone Company injury rate improved

American Artstone Company's TCR fell 36.5 from 41.3 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 41.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=41.3 · 2017=28.6 · 2019=25.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · New Ulm, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 503% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO New Castle Plant
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Castle Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

American Artstone Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Artstone Company averages 16.6 TCR (503% of the Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Artstone Company TCR series: 2016=41.3 · 2017=28.6 · 2019=25.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where American Artstone Company falls in its industry

790 Architectural wall panels, pre establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Architectural wall panels, pre employers in Minnesota.

American Artstone Company (24 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Artstone Company
American Artstone Company (24 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

American Artstone Company has fewer employees than the Architectural wall panels, precast concr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.3 11.3 2 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 0 1 0
2019 25.4 16.9 5 1 0
2017 28.6 6.4 8 1 0
2016 41.3 10.3 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · MN · New Ulm

790 Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 79 employers in New Ulm, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Castle Plant 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springville Plant 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hampton Metal Fab 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concrete Technology Corporation 16.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&R Schugel Trucking, Inc. 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm Medical Center 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Luther College 441 FTE
NAT-TCR Foodservice Northern California - 1009 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Remmey The Pallet Co Lehighton 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Blenheim-Newport Operation LLC 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Norwich: Fire Department 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE S&H Sheet Metal & Fabricating Co., Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Solutions Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stainless Steel Limited 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omro Dairy, LLC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.