Artificial turf installation · Minnesota

American Fence Company of Minnesota

Rochester, MN · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Fence Company of Minnesota runs at 380% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Artificial turf installation workplace, earning a grade F.

American Fence Company of Minnesota: 10.6 TCR = 380% of Artificial turf installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Fence Company of Minnesota safety composite

American Fence Company of Minnesota scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.5

2017→2024

American Fence Company of Minnesota injury rate improved

American Fence Company of Minnesota's TCR fell 15.5 from 15.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.5 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 380% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/30
  • PHOTO Performance Pool & S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Performance Pool & Spa - Service (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

American Fence Company of Minnesota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Fence Company of Minnesota averages 10.6 TCR (380% of the Artificial turf installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Fence Company of Minnesota TCR series: 2017=15.5 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where American Fence Company of Minnesota falls in its industry

1,634 Artificial turf installation establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 30 Artificial turf installation employers in Minnesota.

American Fence Company of Minnesota (26 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate American Fence Company of Minnesota
American Fence Company of Minnesota (26 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

American Fence Company of Minnesota has fewer employees than the Artificial turf installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 16.7 16.7 5 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 14.3 14.3 4 0 0
2020 8.7 8.7 2 0 0
2019 9.2 9.2 2 0 0
2018 17.8 11.9 3 0 0
2017 15.5 15.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MN · Rochester

1,634 Artificial turf installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Performance Pool & Spa - Service 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2453-00060368-60368M 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fence Consultants of West Michigan 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hard Rock Concrete Cutting 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Ventura Family YMCA 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford County Sheriff's Department 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Niblock Excavating & Asphalt Inc 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Arkansas State Freshens 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Popeyes 3352 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Basin I&E Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.R. Wolfe Heating Corp. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.