Fire sprinkler system installation · Minnesota

American Fire Protection Group

Edina, MN · ~643 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Fire Protection Group runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

American Fire Protection Group: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Fire Protection Group safety composite

American Fire Protection Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

American Fire Protection Group injury rate improved

American Fire Protection Group's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=3.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Edina, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #27/153
  • PHOTO Peck Hannaford Brigg…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~643 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peck Hannaford Briggs Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

American Fire Protection Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Fire Protection Group averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Fire Protection Group TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=3 · 2019=1.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where American Fire Protection Group falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 153 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Minnesota.

American Fire Protection Group (643 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Fire Protection Group
American Fire Protection Group (643 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

American Fire Protection Group has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.5 7 0 0
2022 1.7 1.1 9 0 0
2021 1.1 0.6 6 0 0
2019 1.4 1.1 11 0 0
2017 3.0 1.8 18 4 0
2016 2.6 1.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MN · Edina

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 201 employers in Edina, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peck Hannaford Briggs Service 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR construction 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PJ Mechanical Service & Maintenance 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Philladelphia) 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Health & Human Services 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeville Technical Center 645 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benchmark Electronics Minnesota Division Winona 641 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1043 - Eagan 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoenecker's Inc d.b.a BI WORLDWIDE 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 - Edina 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filmtec Corporation 616 FTE
NAT-TCR Dunn Heat Exchangers Bay City 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kbe Ny 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Supplyone Oklahoma City, Inc. - Dallas 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Classic Performance Products, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Synergy Care, Inc. 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Campus 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erlanger Wild Flavors 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 643 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.