General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7

Carteret, NJ · ~643 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7: 1.4 TCR = 24% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2019

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.6 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Carteret, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #60/333
  • PHOTO Logan
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~643 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Logan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 averages 1.4 TCR (24% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.9 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 (643 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 (643 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.9 0.9 1 1 0
2018 1.8 1.0 12 0 0
2017 1.6 1.3 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Carteret

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 37 employers in Carteret, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Logan 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmyra - 500 North Lingle Avenue 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30495 CAPSTONE - MCLANE FINDLAY OH 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 70112 CAPSTONE MD SP HICKORY NC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 010 - BORDENTOWN, NJ 643 FTE
STATE-SIZE LG Electronics USA Inc - Englewood Cliffs, NJ 644 FTE
STATE-SIZE Somerset 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Airport Services EWR UA 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 3,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - EWR9 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CDW5 1,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cosmax USA 685 FTE
NAT-TCR Alpharetta ALP 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FLORIDA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Processing Plant - Pine Mountain Valley, GA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Juno Manufacturing - DP 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Campus 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE Synergy Care, Inc. 643 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Fire Protection Group 643 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.