Machine shops · Illinois

American Grinding & Machine Co.

Chicago, IL · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Grinding & Machine Co. runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine shops workplace, earning a grade D.

American Grinding & Machine Co.: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Machine shops BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Grinding & Machine Co. safety composite

American Grinding & Machine Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American Grinding & Machine Co.: 7.1 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

American Grinding & Machine Co.'s TCR rose 5.1 from 7.1 in 2017 to 12.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #77/103
  • PHOTO Maxcess Magnat-Fairv…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maxcess Magnat-Fairview (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

American Grinding & Machine Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Grinding & Machine Co. averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Machine shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Grinding & Machine Co. TCR series: 2017=7.1 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.3

Where American Grinding & Machine Co. falls in its industry

1,821 Machine shops establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 103 Machine shops employers in Illinois.

American Grinding & Machine Co. (54 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate American Grinding & Machine Co.
American Grinding & Machine Co. (54 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

American Grinding & Machine Co. has more employees than the Machine shops median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 2.4 5 0 0
2023 5.2 0.0 3 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2018 9.8 4.2 7 0 0
2017 7.1 1.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · IL · Chicago

1,821 Machine shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maxcess Magnat-Fairview 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mittler Bros Machine & Tool 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Weston Company 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Engineering Company 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Illinois Crop Improvement Association, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois Electric Cooperative 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenlink Energy Solutions, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE POINTCORE Construction, LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Saw Works, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenspring Village 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PBV-Western Operations Warehouse 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Total Water Treatment Systems Inc. Madison 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Four Seasons Kanga Roof 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. - Chickasha 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quail Street - Albany 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Harris Rebar Mid-Atlantic LLC (Baltimore Facility) 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.