Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · California

American Handforge

Rialto, CA · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Handforge runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

American Handforge: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Handforge safety composite

American Handforge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2024

American Handforge injury rate improved

American Handforge's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Rialto, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/45
  • PHOTO NGMS-N740
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NGMS-N740 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

American Handforge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Handforge averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Handforge TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where American Handforge falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 45 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in California.

American Handforge (36 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American Handforge
American Handforge (36 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

American Handforge has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.7 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CA · Rialto

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Rialto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NGMS-N740 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HWASV01 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3Harris EDO Western Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MA, Fall River - 275 Martine St. (IMS-M) 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB7 4,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB7 4,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB8 2,705 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3806 - Rialto CA DC 1,822 FTE
NAT-TCR Hometown Grocery Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Panama Transfer Des Moines Iowa 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Management, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 22 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE OTT Concrete Construction 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snider Fleet Solutions - Richland Walker Cir 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHAT of Michigan 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fishers IN 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.