Industry profile · NAICS 334511

Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 416 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

416
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
3,191
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
416
employers reporting
3,191
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing sector (NAICS 334511) encompasses 416 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,191 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Leonardo DRS - 1240 Seesetown Road Sidman, PA F 9.0
Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. Shelton, CT F 8.1
Design West Technologies inc. Tustin, CA F 7.2
Sonatech LLC Santa Barbara, CA F 7.0
Dpi Labs, Inc La Verne, CA D 6.5
First Texas prod Corp El Paso, TX D 6.1
HNCGB03 Greensboro, NC D 6.0
BPW Broomfield, CO D 5.1
BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake Chesapeake, VA D 5.0
Sparton : Sparton DLS Deleon Springs, FL D 4.7
ERG Aerospace Corp. CA Oakland, CA D 4.7
Superalloy Manufacturing Solutions Corporation Plant 1 Cincinnati, OH D 4.7
ERG Aerospace Corporation Sparks, NV D 4.7
L3Harris Technologies Inc-Ashaway Ashaway, RI D 4.7
JEMCO Components & Fabrication, Inc. Kirkland, WA D 4.6
4779_10904 Fort Wayne, IN D 4.5
First Texas Products LLC El Paso, TX D 4.5
Adams Rite Aerospace Fullerton, CA D 4.5
P & J Machining Inc Puyallup, WA D 4.3
Edt Nco Lillington, NC D 4.1
Sparton Electronics Deleon Springs, FL D 4.1
Shields Manufacturing Tualatin, OR D 4.0
Safe Flight Instrument, LLC White Plains, NY C 4.0
Tell Tool Westfield, MA C 3.8
Raytheon_Los Angeles_Airport Los Angeles, CA C 3.7
BAE Systems I&S - Maritime Solutions California, MD C 3.6
ATK Space Systems Inc. - Kettering Kettering, OH C 3.6
Leonardo DRS - Sidman Facility Sidman, PA C 3.5
Ultra - Bower Rd Extension Quincy, MA C 3.5
Brogdon Machine Inc Blue Springs, MO C 3.3
Dayton-Granger, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL C 3.2
2017 300 Cleveland, OH C 3.2
Primus Aerospace-MD Resisterstown, MD C 3.2
Undersea Sensor Systems Inc Columbia City, IN C 3.2
Mount Prospect, IL Mount Prospect, IL C 3.1
Sparton DeLeon Springs Deleon Springs, FL C 3.1
Lockheed Martin Corporation Warner Robins Campus (1400) Warner Robins, GA C 3.0
Senior Aerospace Connecticut Enfield, CT C 3.0
Garrett Metal Detectors Garland, TX C 3.0
Kustom Signals, Inc. - Chanute Chanute, KS C 2.9
Ashaway Office Ashaway, RI C 2.8
Allegro MicroSystems (Beaverton) Beaverton, OR C 2.6
Aviation Systems : DC, Washington - 600 Maryland Ave., S.W. (AS-MN) Washington, DC B 2.6
NGMS-X050 Kings Bay, GA B 2.6
Communication Systems : FL, Orlando - 7022 TPC Dr. (CS-PSPC) Orlando, FL B 2.5
Lockheed Martin Corporation US CA San Diego Woden St (1235) San Diego, CA B 2.4
ATK Space Systems Inc. - Rancho Bernardo Rancho Bernardo, CA B 2.4
NGMS-A833 Saint Rose, LA B 2.4
Applied Composites Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN B 2.4
Goodrich ES - Atlantic Inertial Systems Cheshire, CT B 2.4
Page 1 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.