Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

American House - Bonita Springs I/II

Bonita Springs, FL · ~90 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American House - Bonita Springs I/II runs at 482% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

American House - Bonita Springs I/II: 18.3 TCR = 482% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American House - Bonita Springs I/II safety composite

American House - Bonita Springs I/II scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2020→2023

American House - Bonita Springs I/II injury rate improved

American House - Bonita Springs I/II's TCR fell 8.1 from 11.6 in 2020 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 32.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=11.6 · 2021=32.8 · 2022=25.5 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bonita Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 482% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #268/283
  • PHOTO Woodbury Estates
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Woodbury Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

American House - Bonita Springs I/II in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American House - Bonita Springs I/II averages 18.3 TCR (482% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American House - Bonita Springs I/II TCR series: 2020=11.6 · 2021=32.8 · 2022=25.5 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where American House - Bonita Springs I/II falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #268 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

American House - Bonita Springs I/II (90 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American House - Bonita Springs I/II
American House - Bonita Springs I/II (90 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

American House - Bonita Springs I/II has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 25.5 23.5 13 0 0
2021 32.8 19.0 7 12 0
2020 11.6 4.6 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Bonita Springs

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 78 employers in Bonita Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Woodbury Estates 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wasilla Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Wasilla 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Virginia Beach 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Billings 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BHN 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Producerse, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE KING RANCH FLORIDA FARM 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Buena Vista Complex 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coconut Point (HR) 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Resort and Spa 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Resort & Spa 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeRomo's Gourmet Market & Restaurant 221 FTE
NAT-TCR Woodbury Estates 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Feld Entertainment D36 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Irrigation & MFG. Co 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ACI West Bend 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Valley Waste Services, Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayetteville Resource Center - PNG 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goggin Eaton 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1702 Lkq 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.