Landscape contractors (except construction) · Florida

Armstrong Landscape

Jupiter, FL · ~90 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armstrong Landscape runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape contractors (except construction) workplace, earning a grade F.

Armstrong Landscape: 12.8 TCR = 285% of Landscape contractors (except construction) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armstrong Landscape safety composite

Armstrong Landscape scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Armstrong Landscape: 11.1 → 17.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 19.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2024

Armstrong Landscape's TCR rose 6.5 from 11.1 in 2016 to 17.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Jupiter, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 285% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #262/274
  • PHOTO Hamilton Land Servic…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 119 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hamilton Land Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Armstrong Landscape in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armstrong Landscape averages 12.8 TCR (285% of the Landscape contractors (except construction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armstrong Landscape TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=14 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=13.1 · 2024=17.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Armstrong Landscape falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape contractors (except establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #262 safest of 274 Landscape contractors (except employers in Florida.

Armstrong Landscape (90 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Armstrong Landscape
Armstrong Landscape (90 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Armstrong Landscape has more employees than the Landscape contractors (except constructi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.7 9.3 20 1 0
2023 13.1 6.1 14 1 0
2022 9.8 8.1 9 2 0
2021 14.0 13.1 15 0 0
2020 19.4 13.6 20 0 0
2019 11.8 9.6 11 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2017 13.1 12.1 14 0 0
2016 11.1 9.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · FL · Jupiter

2,875 Landscape contractors (except construction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 95 employers in Jupiter, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Land Services, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Bay 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tomlinson Bomberger Lawn Care & Landscape, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Garden Landscaping 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE BHN 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Producerse, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE KING RANCH FLORIDA FARM 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Buena Vista Complex 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach 1,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC-055 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter Beeline Hwy DFC (5295) 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Keystone Koating Mifflintown 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Dunmore Division 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FJM-Ferro, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DWI4 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwestern Industries, Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE NCI Manufacturing, Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Packaging Distribution Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-City Mechanical Contractors Inc 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.