Garbage trucks assembling on purchased chassis · New Jersey

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc.

Woodbridge, NJ · ~496 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. runs at 538% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage trucks assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc.: 17.8 TCR = 538% of Garbage trucks assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. safety composite

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc.: 9.3 → 26.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2023

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc.'s TCR rose 16.9 from 9.3 in 2022 to 26.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Woodbridge, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 538% of ind

  • DART 15.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Pioneer Truckweld Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 173 inj
  • SIZE ~496 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Truckweld Inc. (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. averages 17.8 TCR (538% of the Garbage trucks assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. TCR series: 2022=9.3 · 2023=26.2 · BLS 3.3

Where American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. falls in its industry

470 Garbage trucks assembling on p establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Garbage trucks assembling on p employers in New Jersey.

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. (496 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc.
American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. (496 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. has more employees than the Garbage trucks assembling on purchased c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 26.2 15.0 78 4 0
2022 9.3 4.2 95 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · NJ · Woodbridge

470 Garbage trucks assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 43 employers in Woodbridge, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Truckweld Inc. 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monroe Custom Utility Bodies 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isometrics, Inc. - 1 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakota Bodies LLC 17.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJ02 - Swedesboro Fulfillment Center 497 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abbvie (L-Allergan Field Sales ) 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carteret B094 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Woodbridge 032 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR #522 Woodbridge Shoprite 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5281 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodbridge Center 009 279 FTE
NAT-TCR Graham HealthCare & Rehabilittion Center 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Iroquois Nursing Home Inc 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01259 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 198358-Sha-Brookridge Br 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nongshim America, Inc. 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Country (WCW) 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-ILARL300 496 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mostl - St. Louis 496 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.