Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility, van), assembled on purchased chassis · Indiana

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies

Greenfield, IN · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies runs at 547% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility, van), assembled on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies: 18.0 TCR = 547% of Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility, van), assembled on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies safety composite

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies: 10.8 → 17.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies's TCR rose 6.5 from 10.8 in 2022 to 17.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 26.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Greenfield, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.0 · 547% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO American Maritime Se…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monroe Custom Utility Bodies averages 18.0 TCR (547% of the Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility, van), assembled on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies TCR series: 2022=10.8 · 2023=26.1 · 2024=17.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Monroe Custom Utility Bodies falls in its industry

470 Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dum establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dum employers in Indiana.

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies (61 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Monroe Custom Utility Bodies
Monroe Custom Utility Bodies (61 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Monroe Custom Utility Bodies has fewer employees than the Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.3 7.8 11 0 0
2023 26.1 4.3 12 0 0
2022 10.8 0.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · IN · Greenfield

470 Boxes, truck (e.g., cargo, dump, utility, van), assembled on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 126 employers in Greenfield, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Maritime Services of NJ, Inc. 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Truckweld Inc. 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isometrics, Inc. - 1 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakota Bodies LLC 17.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABI Attachments, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Wayne NE Service Center 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 358-NiSource-Valparaiso Eastport Center 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 165-NiSource-Hammond IN-El Disp Cont Ctr 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MQJ1 2,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Management Services, Inc 2,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield 1,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Headquarters 1,453 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0150 Bend 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #11 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RJ Gorman Marine Construction 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR West Chicago Terrace 18.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regal Rexnord Precision Gear 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE BKLBROOKLYNNY 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akins Fresh Market-Quincy 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE PITPITTSBURGHPA 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.