Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing · Virginia

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc.

Newport News, VA · ~19 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. safety composite

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2020→2024

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. injury rate improved

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc.'s TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Newport News, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Quest Rail LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quest Rail LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. TCR series: 2020=4.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. falls in its industry

208 Industrial locomotives and par establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Industrial locomotives and par employers in Virginia.

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. (19 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate American Turbocharger Technologies Inc.
American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. (19 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

American Turbocharger Technologies Inc. has fewer employees than the Industrial locomotives and parts manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · VA · Newport News

208 Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 330 employers in Newport News, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quest Rail LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrange IL Engine Plant EMD 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alorton IL Trackwork 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loram Maintenance of Way (Corporate Office) 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek & Seamans Orchard, Inc 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Temperanceville Growout 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gordonsville Power Station 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manassas Office 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newport News Shipbuilding - Division of Huntington Ingalls Industries 24,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center 2,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center-113 1,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12490 Jefferson Ave 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Door Control Sevices - Ben Wheeler 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TX510 Dallas WH 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Boldt Company - Waukesha, WI 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SSRI 0.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.