Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Texas

American Valve and Hydrant

Beaumont, TX · ~204 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Valve and Hydrant runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

American Valve and Hydrant: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Valve and Hydrant safety composite

American Valve and Hydrant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

American Valve and Hydrant injury rate improved

American Valve and Hydrant's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Beaumont, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #44/59
  • PHOTO Plattco Corporation
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~204 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plattco Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

American Valve and Hydrant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Valve and Hydrant averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Valve and Hydrant TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=6 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where American Valve and Hydrant falls in its industry

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 59 Angle valves, industrial-type, employers in Texas.

American Valve and Hydrant (204 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate American Valve and Hydrant
American Valve and Hydrant (204 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

American Valve and Hydrant has more employees than the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.7 5 0 0
2023 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2022 6.0 5.2 15 0 0
2021 2.1 1.3 5 0 0
2020 2.4 1.9 5 0 0
2019 2.4 1.9 5 0 0
2018 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · TX · Beaumont

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 329 employers in Beaumont, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plattco Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fike Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neles USA Inc. - Shrewsbury , MA 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swagelok Falon 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bluewater Constructors, Inc. 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Hill Parkway Project 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE SACC 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyondell Basell CVO N 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas 2,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-1618 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR ID Technology-York 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MTS Manufacturing 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Red Hill 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc of Florida 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE T & R Electric Supply Co. Inc. 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artesian Water Company, Inc.- Newark Establishment 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Engineered Composites 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bama Foods Ltd Partnership 204 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.