Industry profile · NAICS 332911

Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 332 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

332
Employers
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
3,843
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing average 2.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.6
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
332
employers reporting
3,843
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 332911) encompasses 332 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,843 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.6 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Olson Technologies Allentown, PA F 13.9
Velan Valve Williston, VT F 11.4
American Cap Company Wheatland, PA F 10.3
Specialty Precision Machining Saint Paul, MN F 10.1
Clow Valve div of McWane Corona, CA F 9.8
Ayia02-Aymi-Aym - Albia Albia, IA F 9.3
United Brass Works, Inc. Randleman, NC F 9.0
Velan - Williston Williston, VT F 8.6
Penn-Troy Troy, PA F 7.7
PFUSA Weirton Weirton, WV F 7.7
MCM Oil Tools, Inc Houston, TX F 7.4
Pathway Control Products, Inc. New Caney, TX F 7.4
BNL Industries, Inc. Vernon, CT F 7.3
Waterman Valve Exeter, CA F 7.2
Richards Industrials Cin, OH F 7.2
Bellofram Acquisition II LLC, DBA Whittle & Neher Company Oklahoma City, OK F 6.7
Specialty Dental Granite Falls, MN F 6.6
Refrigeration Sales Inc Jackson, MI D 6.4
Prop Shaft Supply Delavan, WI D 6.3
Romac Industries Inc Bothell, WA D 6.2
The Maquoketa Company Maquoketa, IA D 6.2
Delaware Manufacturing Industries Corporation North Tonawanda, NY D 6.0
Dewalch Technologies Houston, TX D 5.9
Flomatic Corporation Glens Falls, NY D 5.8
American AVK Company Minden, NV D 5.8
Plug Group Westbrook, CT D 5.8
Peter Paul Electronics Co., Inc. New Britain, CT D 5.7
Maxitrol Company-Colon Division Colon, MI D 5.7
BioChem85Boonton Boonton, NJ D 5.3
Tate Andale, LLC Baltimore, MD D 5.3
Protego (USA), Inc. Ladson, SC D 5.3
Bypass Facility Pageland, SC D 5.2
Kimball Kimball, TN D 5.1
APCO Schaumburg, IL D 5.1
Backflow Direct Rancho Cordova, CA D 5.0
Shop 1 Houston, TX D 5.0
Fetterolf Corporation Skippack, PA D 5.0
AMRESIST Houston, TX D 4.9
Watson McDaniel Company Pottstown, PA D 4.9
Clow Valve Company Oskaloosa, IA D 4.8
Kimray Inc. Oklahoma City, OK D 4.7
Shewood Valve LLC - Brooklyn, OH Plant Brooklyn, OH D 4.7
Spence Engineering, Inc. Walden, NY D 4.7
Scheerer Bearing Corporation Willow Grove, PA D 4.7
Emerson Automation Solutions Isolation Valves Inc. Oklahoma City, OK D 4.5
PEBCO Paducah, KY D 4.5
Griswold Controls Irvine, CA D 4.5
Pentair Residential Filtration, LLC - Brookfield Brookfield, WI D 4.5
Hilton Acquisition Company LLC Redmond, WA D 4.4
Morrison Bros. Mfg. Dubuque, IA D 4.4
Page 1 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.6 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.